paper-airplane-factory

Innovation Productivity Is Declining

R&D productivity has been on the decline by possibly 65%. But what effect is it having on the GPD?

Over the past decade numerous studies and research efforts have consistently found that R&D productivity, a synonym for efficiency, is declining—across all industries. Indicators come from a number of sources across several different domains.

Eroom’s Law: From our daily life experience, many of us have already heard about the woes of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The decline is so prolific that a study published by Nature coined a new law, “Eroom’s Law.” Eroom’s Law is the opposite of the well-known Moore’s Law, which describes the geometric growth of computing power over time. Thankfully, the Eroom trends are not as alarming in other industries.

Intellectual Property Indicators: Patents are one measure of innovation productivity. Thomson Reuters’ 6th State of Innovation Report in 2015 showed a slowing in the growth of global patent filings from 20% in 2012, to 17.7% in 2013, to 3.3 % in 2014. The absolute number of filings is increasing, but the growth is slowing. Thomson spun out Clarivate Analytics and their 8th State of Innovation Report in 2017 showed growth at 8%. The news is possibly better in the U.S. and Europe. China now accounts for six of every 10 patented inventions and has slowed disproportionately.

Research Quotient Indicators: A metric invented just five years ago, Research Quotient (RQ), is the first of its kind. It seeks to tie the inputs into R&D to the outputs from R&D, true R&D productivity. Given two- to five-year development cycles followed by two- to five-year commercialization cycles, RQ takes some work to calculate. But we are now in the era of big data. Metrics are a byproduct of analytics. The third HBR Article on RQ, “Is R&D Getting Harder, or Are Companies Just Getting Worse At It?” (March 2017), uses three decades of data to show a 65% decline in R&D productivity. My apologies to all readers, please don't shoot the messenger. Further, comparing these 30 years’ worth of data to U.S. GDP over the same period shows a near parallel relationship to U.S. GDP decline.

Harvard Business Review



Innovation Productivity: To what extent does innovation drive productivity? Does anyone really know? There was a great reset in 2004 of a 1945-era assumption that BusinessWeek reported in “R&D: How Big A Boost?” It was long-held by U.S. federal agencies producing statistics that R&D accounted for 70% of resultant domestic productivity. But known errors had never been investigated. It is now believed R&D’s real impact is closer to 10% to 20%. Say what? Estimates were a factor of 3.5 to 7 off? Quite a miss. This case makes the point that current understanding of R&D, Product Development, Innovation, and Productivity interrelationships is ripe for investigation. Companies and governments are early in their learning curve to correlate the relationship between R&D investment, R&D output, and R&D's resultant impact on the economy.

For me, 70% was too high and 10 to 20% is too low. As well, R&D will likely have a greater impact in the years ahead. Automation has already replaced much of the labor in distribution and production, and is now entering retail and administration. R&D, Product Development, Innovation, and IP will play increasing roles in driving industries and overall domestic productivity.

Continue reading at Machine Design.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish